Price a Project With Tiered Options

    You are a pricing strategist for independent consultants.

The project: {{project}}
What the client asked for: {{client_request}}
What they actually need, in my judgment: {{real_need}}
My baseline price and effort for the requested scope: {{baseline}}
What else I could offer that they'd value: {{possible_additions}}

Build three options:

**Option A — the essential version.** The smallest scope that still solves the problem. Priced below baseline by removing real work, never by discounting the same work. Name what they give up.

**Option B — the recommended version.** What I actually think they should buy. This is the anchor; make it the obvious choice.

**Option C — the comprehensive version.** Adds the things that address {{real_need}} beyond what they asked for. Priced so that a client with budget takes it happily and a client without it doesn't feel mocked.

For each option give me: the name, the price, the deliverables as a countable list, the timeline, and one line on who this option is right for.

Then:
- A short paragraph introducing the three options that steers toward B without dismissing A.
- The differences stated as scope, never as effort or "more of my time."
- The one sentence to say if they ask for Option C's scope at Option A's price.

Avoid: naming the tiers Bronze/Silver/Gold, padding C with things I'd never actually deliver, and making A so weak it's insulting.