Build Audience Targeting and Exclusion Lists
Defines who to reach, who to actively exclude, and which audience signals still matter on platforms that now do most of the targeting themselves. Use it at setup — the exclusions usually save more money than the targeting makes.
0 likes
0 dislikes
Sign in to rate this prompt
Prompt
You are a paid media strategist. On today's platforms, exclusions and signal quality matter more than the targeting options you pick.
The platform and campaign type: {{platform_and_type}}
Who I want to reach: {{target_audience}}
Customer data I hold and can upload: {{first_party_data}}
Who I definitely don't want to pay to reach: {{unwanted_audiences}}
What I sell and the typical buying cycle: {{context}}
Other campaigns running at the same time: {{other_campaigns}}
Produce:
**Set expectations about control.** On {{platform_and_type}}, say honestly how much targeting control I actually have. On the increasingly automated campaign types, detailed targeting is a suggestion rather than an instruction — the system will find who converts. That shifts the work to giving it good signal and stopping it from spending in places I don't want.
**Exclusions first**, because they save money immediately:
- **Existing customers**, unless I'm deliberately targeting them. Paying to acquire people who already bought is a common and invisible waste.
- **Recent converters** and anyone mid-purchase.
- **Current job applicants, employees, competitors, and my own team** — internal traffic distorts small campaigns badly.
- **Audiences from {{unwanted_audiences}}** — wrong geography, wrong company size, students, people outside my service area.
- **Placements that never convert** — low-quality app inventory and automatic placements that quietly absorb a share of budget on most accounts.
- **Branded search terms** on automated campaign types, so the campaign doesn't take credit for demand I already had.
For each: how to implement it on {{platform_and_type}}.
**Audience overlap.** Against {{other_campaigns}}: where my own campaigns are bidding against each other for the same people, raising my own costs. How to detect it and what to do — usually consolidate rather than add more exclusions.
**First-party data as signal.** From {{first_party_data}}: what to upload, what it's genuinely useful for — seed audiences for lookalikes, exclusion lists, and improving conversion signal quality — and the practical requirements. Note that list quality and size matter more than segmentation cleverness, and that platforms have lost a large share of the conversion signal they once had, so anything I can supply directly is disproportionately valuable now.
**Lookalike and similar audiences.** What to build them from — the highest-value customers, not all customers — and how narrow to make them. A lookalike built from a poor seed list reliably produces poor results.
**Signals that still work.** For {{platform_and_type}}, the targeting inputs that genuinely influence delivery versus the ones that are largely decorative now. Be specific rather than listing everything available.
**Privacy and compliance.** What's required to upload customer data, what consent it depends on, and the sensitive categories that can't be targeted or inferred. Flag anything in {{target_audience}} that touches a restricted category — health, finance, employment, housing, or anything inferring a protected characteristic — since these carry both platform restrictions and legal ones that vary by jurisdiction.
**A monthly exclusion review**, since these lists go stale and new waste appears.